Is Backup a Security Product or a Storage Product?

Following up on my comments on Microsoft OneCare, I'd be interested to have you put on your wizard hats and tell me how the world is going to view companies like Carbonite five years hence. One scenario is that backup will be considered as part of the data security industry, and will be merged into anti-virus, firewall, anti-spyware, and the like. Another view is that backup will be one of a number of data storage-related products, such as archiving, local backup, bare metal restore, smart document storage, and so forth. A third scenario is that backup is just such a big opportunity in itself (after all, there are 700 million Internet-connected PCs out there) that you can build a very large company doing nothing but online backup.

The first scenario suggests that backup companies will eventually be gobbled up by the anti-virus companies, just as Symantec acquired Swapdrive (now part of the Norton 360 suite). The second scenario is that backup is about storage, and the EMC acquisition of Mozy would argue that direction. They are already making noises about bundling backup with other storage products, such as Iomega. The third is that none of these guys will have the focus to do a really exceptional job at online backup, and well-funded pure-play companies like Carbonite will build brand and distribution and a new category will emerge dominated by pure-play vendors.

Anyone care to comment?


Dave
CEO, Carbonite

Related posts

Comments

December 12. 2008 06:03

John O'Neill

Is backup a security product or a storage product?
The paradox is that they are both and neither. Backup needs to be secure but in it's purest sense brings security to it's own function and the copies of data it deals with, not other copies throughout the organisation. It is a storage product but simple storage does not offer the protection of online backup.
I think the X-drive story shows that success in online backup is not simply about price/volume but very much about software, support and direction. I think the Microsoft oneCare story shows that attempts to mix crucial functions such as online backup with other products dilutes the client perception of what is on offer and what is most important.
Takevers in the online backup market based on acquiring improved technology are most likely to succeed. Any volume only based takeovers in unsuportable low price markets are less likely to succees unless the buyer can afford the time and money to reconsolidate the purchased client base.
Just my opinion. I reckon I'm nt too far wrong given the way things are in the world today.
John
http://www.backupanytime.com/blog

John O'Neill

December 13. 2008 16:35

David Orban

The segmentation of the market, at least between consumer and enterprise products, matters in my opinion. While companies are concerned about processes, procedures, and compliance, the behavior of an individual is much more pragmatic. Given the consumer orientation of Carbonite it is important to view the moves of competitors with this in mind too.

A person simply wants the bad guys kept at bay, and her documents safe. If a single product can do this, good. If it takes two separate products, than there is an increased need for simplicity and transparent operations on both.

David Orban

Comments are closed